On July 31st, DCR blogged about guidance offered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regarding a liberal definition that would qualify most temporary workers – both agency-supplied contingent workers and freelancers – as employees. These individuals would qualify for many of the benefits previously reserved for “permanent employees”.
The NLRB has now gone a step further. Last Thursday, the NLRB redefined the standard to determine joint-employment status ‘to better effectuate the purposes of the (Nation Labor Relations) Act’, saying its previous standard has failed to keep pace with economic circumstances and changes in the workplace! The NLRB pointed to the fact that an increasing number of U.S. workers are employed through temporary staffing agencies. They cited in their decision a “dramatic growth in contingent employment relationships” that “potentially undermines the core protections of the act for the employees impacted by these economic changes.”
The new standard specifies that two or more entities may be deemed to be joint employers, when:
In simple language, this means that in the past, companies generally had to share decision-making on employment matters such as firing, hiring and discipline in ways the board said would have a meaningful effect on the workers. Under the revised standard, the NLRB also will consider if a business exercises indirect control through an intermediary, or has reserved the right to do so. While the staffing agencies serve as employer of record to their contingent workers, it is common practice for the staffing agency’s client to select the worker, define the length of the engagement, provide day-to-day supervision, and direct the agency to terminate unsatisfactory workers. Under the new ruling, and of those actions can be viewed as “indirect control”.
This ruling was in response to a suit brought by a local Teamsters union against Browning Ferris Inc. (BFI) and its staffing supplier, Leadpoint. The union claimed that it couldn’t adequately bargain for the workers unless Leadpoint and BFI were both at the bargaining table. The Board found that, BFI possessed indirect and direct control over the essential terms and conditions of employment. This has also made BFI liable for the way Leadpoint treats its contract employees.
Implications of the New Law:
The law could seriously affect a variety of businesses dependent upon temporary workers, including restaurants, retailers, manufacturers, hotels, cleaning services and – last but not the least – staffing agencies. The NLRB is determined to make sure that the person who tells a worker what to do, and shares in the decision with regard to the essential terms and conditions of employment, must take responsibility as a joint employer.
The ruling could prove to be a shot in the arm for organized labor, accelerating the growth of unions. Though the logistics of a three-way negotiation may seem daunting, it is to be expected that most of the employment-related decisions will ultimately be up to the staffing buyer. Possible ramifications of the New Standard:
As we stated in the earlier blog, the real test of the meaning of the NLRB ruling, and the extent to which this new standard will be applied, is unknown. Rulings on additional litigation may be required for us to truly understand where the NLRB will draw the line. We do offer this advice: this is definitely not the time for any business to risk managing its contingent workforce without the aid of subject matter experts. Would you agree? Please write in and let us know.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
9 − = four
Thanks for Subscribing to DCR Blog.